Meaning
Measuring the information loss when approximating an empirical probability distribution quantifies model divergence. Statistical methods using kullback leibler estimation calculate the expected log likelihood ratio between a true distribution and a candidate reference model. The measurement applies to continuous and discrete probability spaces but fails when the approximating distribution assigns zero probability to observed events.
Relative Entropy
Information discrepancy between observed event frequencies and model forecasts appears as a positive scalar value. Through kullback leibler estimation, an analyst measures the specific penalty incurred by selecting a simplified operational distribution. Zero entropy indicates identical probability distributions across the shared sample space.
Asymmetric Direction
Non-symmetric mathematical properties mean that swapping target and reference distributions alters the calculated value. In risk modeling, continuous kullback leibler estimation produces different optimization targets depending on whether the calculation minimizes forward divergence or reverse divergence. Forward divergence forces the model to cover all empirical modes, whereas reverse divergence compresses the model around a single dominant mode.
Choosing between these modes determines whether operational risk models understate or overstate tail probabilities.
Sample Dispersion
Empirical estimations degrade when small sample sizes introduce high variance into density calculations. Finite observational data cause kullback leibler estimation to overfit rare event occurrences unless regularizing constraints stabilize the target distribution.